Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Shiloh

WTF Are We Doing in Afghanistan?

Recommended Posts

https://www.alternet.org/wtf-are-we-still-doing-afghanistan

 

WTF Are We Still Doing in Afghanistan?

Spending $45 billion a year, and Erik Prince wants every dime

By Lucian K. Truscott IV / Salon October 6, 2018, 3:07 AM GMT

Print

COMMENTS

 

Blackwater founder Erik Prince.

Photo Credit: Screenshot / YouTube

 

Did you read what happened earlier this week in Afghanistan? A suicide bomber set himself off in Nangarhar Province, east of Jalalabad on Tuesday and killed 14 people at an election rally. At least 43 were injured in the attack, according to the New York Times.

 

Last month, a suicide bomber attacked a peaceful protest in Nangarhar Province, killing 68 and wounding 165 others.

 

The next day, another suicide bomber attacked a wrestling gym in Afghanistans capital, Kabul, killing 30, including journalists and aid workers, and injuring 91 more.

 

 

In June, a suicide bomber killed 13 people and injured 25 more outside one of the government ministries in Kabul. This happened a week after another suicide attack in Kabul, which killed 14 Muslim clerics who had gathered to issue a fatwa against suicide bombings, according to The Independent.

 

Not to worry. Its Erik Prince, former Blackwater chief and brother of Betsy Devos, to the rescue!

 

Yes, according to the New York Times, Prince, the king of private contractors during the Iraq war, has returned to the battlefield to save our 17 year war in Afghanistan for us!

 

How is he going to do this? Well, for starters, hes got his eyeballs firmly fixed on the tax dollars were currently spending in Afghanistan.

 

According to the Senate Subcommittee on Federal Spending Oversight, we are spending at least $45 billion a year in Afghanistan. About one billion of that amount is spent for economic aid to Afghanistan, and $5 billion is being spent on Afghan forces, according to the report. That leaves $13 billion were currently spending on U.S. military forces in Afghanistan, and $26 billion on logistical support. Its that $39 billion Erik Prince has his eyes on.

 

 

Report Advertisement

Just between you and me, thats a shitload of money.

 

What he wants to do is draw down our military forces until all weve got over there are 2,500 special operations troops for counterterrorism missions according to the Times. Prince would replace the 15,000 American military forces currently serving in Afghanistan with about 6,000 of his private contractors. The Times reports that his contractors would provide skeletal structure support, whatever the hell that is, as well as training for Afghan forces.

 

Prince proposes that his force of 6,000 private contractors would be supported by air through a fleet of contracted aircraft flown by joint teams of Afghans and contractors, according to the Times. Huh? Just who those contracted aircraft would belong to, Erik is keeping to himself. But heres a hint: were not in the habit of loaning out our combat aircraft to the kind of rent-a-private-pilots Prince is proposing.

 

Weve got 15,000 troops over there being supported by what amounts to unlimited Air Force and if need be Naval air support, as well as American Army attack helicopters and Blackhawks. And our soldiers are serving in support of Afghan forces in fighting the Taliban, which means that they are providing intelligence, air support and logistical support to the Afghan army (remember the $26 billion for logistical support? Some of that supports the Afghans).

 

And with all of that support, all of those American troops, and those tens of billions of dollars being spent, Afghan security forces are dying at a record number of 30 to 40 a day, according to the Times. Not to mention the hundreds of civilians being killed by seemingly endless suicide bomb attacks.

 

 

Erik Princes genius plan would take the $13 billion were spending to pay for 15,000 American soldiers and use it to pay for 6,000 private contractors. And he would take the $26 billion being used for logistical support for 15,000 American and Afghan forces, and use it to support his 6,000 contractors and whatever he decides to throw the Afghan armys way.

 

Gee, do you see any room for profit there?

 

Of course, Prince is pitching his plan to the White House as a way to save money. He knows all about saving money fighting wars, this guy. According to the Times, his firm Blackwater was given hundreds of millions of dollars in contracts during the war in Iraq before his firm was blacklisted after some of his contractors shot a bunch of civilians in Baghdad in 2007.

 

Lets see . . . the war in Iraq started in 2003. That means in four years, he was able to glom hundreds of billions of our tax dollars in private contracts over there before he was fired. The man is really, really good at spending money, that much is clear.

 

And dont forget, when tax dollars are spent on private contracts, a profit is built in. When tax dollars are spent to pay American soldiers and send them to war, nobody profits. Not the soldiers. Not the government. Not the taxpayers. Nobody.

 

The report from the Senate Subcommittee on Federal Spending Oversight states that total cost for the war weve been fighting in Afghanistan is somewhere between $841 billion a figure Brown Universitys Cost of Wars Project says is vastly underestimated to approximately $2 trillion.

 

Thats the kind of money Prince has his eye on down the road. Weve spent 17 years over there. For all of his talk of ending American military government in Afghanistan, he knows were not going anywhere. He knows were going to keep on throwing money at the problem, because thats what America does.

 

He just wants a good portion of the tens of billions were going to throw to land in his pocket. An American soldier was killed in Afghanistan last Thursday, making a total of eight American soldiers killed there this year. A total of 2,372 American soldiers have died in Afghanistan since 2001, with more than 20,000 wounded.

 

Thats the blood of the blood and treasure, politicians say we have spent in Afghanistan for 17 years.

 

What Erik Prince wants to do is replace the blood of American soldiers with the blood of his private contractors. He wants to take the treasure out of our tax-paying pockets and put it in his capitalistic profit-making pocket.

 

That has never been done in this country. We dont hire mercenary armies and send them overseas to fight our wars for us. We send our Army and our Navy and our Air Force and our Marines overseas if we think something is important enough to fight a war for.

 

If we change our minds, and calculate that something isnt worth spending our blood and treasure on, we bring our soldiers and sailors and airmen and marines home.

 

What we dont do is substitute what we believe in for profit. We dont substitute the men and women who serve in our armed forces for mercenaries. And we dont substitute our financial sacrifices in taxes we pay for profits going into the already-bulging pockets of the likes of Erik Prince.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that the Taliban controls half the territory in Afghanistan, US troops massively increased bombing killing 40% more civilians every year during Trump's administration.

Record numbers of Afghan military and police are dying 28,500 this year.

Again, WTF are we doing there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are some very good reasons not to let the Taliban take the country back, though. It would make more sense if they were primarily backed up by India, although that would be quite provocative to Pakistan. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuck Pakistan... shouldn't have harbored UBL.  Their opinion should matter little anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The deaths will continue regardless. They need a proper negotiated peace agreement upheld by UN peacekeepers drawn from countries in the region. Yes, peacekeepers bring their own problems, but it's the best solution available. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pullout here, or in Syria, or Iraq is essentially impossible regardless of rhetoric.  The wars are now institutions that cannot be changed. 

Edited by Cosmoline

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

although that would be quite provocative to Pakistan. 

 

That's an understatement. Pakistan regards Afghanistan as it's strategic depth if India invades, this is why they have always sponcered  Islamist movements in Afghanistan, to keep them ideologically on side, and prevent them developing to the point where they could press their own border disputes with Pakistan. Pakistan would regard Indian troops in Afghan as being surrounded by a bigger more powerful hostile force, it might start a nuclear war

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it was an understatement. I think it's likely to happen if a peace agreement doesn't materialise soon. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×